Skip to main content

An Open Letter to Senator Mitch McConnell




Senator McConnell,

I first started following your career with some degree of admiration while a young dental student at the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry and you were the County Judge/Executive for Jefferson County in the early to mid 1980’s. It mattered not that I was a registered Democrat and you were a Republican for I have never voted party lines. I always vote the issues and for the candidate whom I feel can best wrest with those issues. I watched in awe as you ran your 1st senatorial campaign, the “Where’s Dee” ads were a stroke of genius that absolutely put a very closely contested race over the top. Although in retrospect, this ad was based upon a falsehood. Statistically, Huddleston was present for ~94% of the senate floor votes during his tenure. Actually, a much better than average voting record among his colleagues at the time.

As you began your senatorial career I was impressed with the ease with which you seemed to pick up the nuances of the senate and it’s constitutional mandates. You seemed intent upon making positive changes for both Kentucky and the U.S. as a whole. The good of the many seemed more important to you than the good of the few, or, to put it more bluntly, you appeared to practice country over party. A quality that I admire in any politician, whether I agree with their political stance or not. But this quality was short lived. It seems you quickly discovered that if you wanted to move up in your party’s hierarchy, you would have to become much more conservative and tow the party line. Something you seemed more than willing to to do. The end justifying the means so to speak.

From the moment you made the decision to bow to the whims of the party demagogues you never looked back, and you never put the interests of Kentucky or the nation above those of the Republican Party again. You have had the chance to have a hand in campaign finance reform, taking unlimited corporate financing out of elections, effectively buying elections. But you chose not to because people such as the Koch brothers were plentiful and more than willing to contribute to you and your Republican colleagues. Don’t misunderstand, I realize these folks are plentiful on the left as well, they just seem more determined on the right. And in either case it’s wrong, they’re essentially buying the election.

You emphatically accused Mr. Obama of a war on coal and repeatedly laid the death of the coal industry at his feet. The problem with that  begins in the mid 1980’s. That’s when I opened my first dental practice in Eastern Kentucky. Almost without fail, each and every patient who sat in my chair that had any association with the mining industry had one message for me. It was just to bad that I couldn’t have opened my practice just ten years earlier when King Coal was booming. When the popular saw was that there were more millionaires per capita in Pike County, Kentucky than any other county in the nation. They were certain that the coal industry was now dying or dead (mid to late 80’s) and it would not be resurrected. Sir, you have been a member of the senate since this time. A member from one of the leading coal producing states in the country. A look at your record shows that you have done little to nothing to stop this death during your 30+ year tenure. Further you have gone so far as to stymie stabilizing efforts of the retired miners pension funds. You mocked Mr. Obama’s efforts at environmental protection and miner safety but have said nothing as deaths have doubled from mining accidents in the wake of Mr. Trump’s withdrawal of so many safety regulations and the dramatic increase in black lung cases following the lowering of environmental working conditions within the mines. These things have benefited the bottom line of the mine owners and almost certainly never affect their health so it’s all good, the party comes out stronger in the bases eyes.

Publicly, approximately two years after Mr. Obama assumed office, you stated you had no greater legislative goal than to make him a one term president. You use this timeframe as evidence that you gave him time to prove himself before forming a decision regarding this president. Yet leaks concerning speeches you gave just after Mr. Obama was elected Bell your true feelings. According to those present, you felt Mr. Obama was to popular to take head on. You said the party would have to give the appearance of cooperation but actually try to quietly stymie his legislative efforts at every turn until such time as his popularity had fallen to the point that you could overtly confront his agenda. Apparently this came when you made your public statement of obstructionism. And you continued that agenda with vigor for the entirety of Mr. Obama’s presidency to the point that you convinced many in the electorate that he was quite ineffectual. It all culminated in your refusal to even hold hearings on the president’s Supreme Court nominee, stating there wasn’t enough time left in the presidency to properly consider the nomination and that the nation should be able to choose the next president who would pick this nominee. There was time, almost a year, and the electorate had chosen a president to pick this nominee. Mr. Obama’s term was legitimate and in force until the minute Mr. Trump took the oath of office. He had every right to make that nomination. You had no right to hold it. You usurped the constitutional process for your own political gains.

Polling consistently shows you to be among the most unliked senators in their home district within the U.S. Surely, you can’t be happy about this. Surely you want to work toward the goals that matter to your constituents, not just those items that further the agenda of the party. It seems you have a choice to make. You can choose to become a senator who champions the causes of your constituents and works for the betterment of society as a whole. You can strive to emulate a great man who the nation just interred at the Naval Academy, Senator John McCain, or the Lion of the Senate, Senator Edward Kennedy. Both of these men personally knew sacrifice, both worked tirelessly for the betterment of the country. Neither was perfect, they had their own demons to slay. Each came from a different philosophy but each had the same goal in mind, to make America the best she can be, not the best the Republican or Democratic Party can be. You even have an extremely worthy example to follow from our own states history. The Great Compromiser himself, Henry Clay. Or you can continue to align  yourself with the divisiveness and hatred of Mr. Trump and push an agenda of party first above all else.  You have a decision to make and time is fast running out. From the grassroots rumblings I’m hearing, I’d say you’ve got until your next general election.

Comments

  1. Randy, that was an amazing bit of writing. Clear thinking that suffers no fools. I wish this was more widely distributed as it would do Mitch some good to read something from one of his own. Right now I fear he is too busy trying to pull a fast one on the American people to notice. I am also envious of your ability to maintain the focus to make such a well thought-out point. My "good" times are so short and unpredictable, I only get little bits of functionality, not anything sustainable. Well done sir.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jeff, thank you for the encouraging words but don’t get to excited about the maintained focus. This took me several days of back and forth, man I can’t believe I wrote that drivel, rewrite it again, hope it made sense, look again when I’m clearer later type of writing I’m sure you’re quite familiar with.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh I totally get that. Focus for me these days is a limited commodity; once gone, so am I. I know he is your senator (right?) but I never understood how McConnell could argue for delaying/skipping Merricks nomination because of the potential impending change in presidency, yet now he is arguing for moving faster and skipping checks and balances on Kavanaugh because...there is no question a presidency is in question come November. Can't have it both ways bro. I mean after this, who the hell can trust anything this man says?

      Delete
    2. Yes, unfortunately he is one of my two distinguished senators. Trust me, most of his reasonable constituents stopped believing most of what he said a long time ago. He wins elections now because he is THE master fund raiser and he can more than out spend, ie., buy the election, any opponent.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dementia Cannabis Update

Update: 22 July
Project started, grow page and journal is here:

Operation: Constant Clarity


This is one of the most difficult posts I have had to write, mostly because I "had" to. Allow me to explain and I promise by the end you will not only understand the "difficulty" and the "had to" bit but also I hope you come away with a few new assumptions or conclusions, you pick and if all that passes you by, perhaps you will find illumination as this is some serious "dementia from the inside out" kinda shit.

The 18:1 Theory
Before I tell you what happened, please recall I have expressed a theory or hypothesis on the effects of a cannabis extract/concentrate that tests out to have a CBD:THC ratio of 18-1 on the demented mind. By demented I mean any brain with not just dementia but anything that alters so-called normal operation. I don't mean anything like it fixes everything, rather there are things that are fixed by this like PTSD and ADD that you …

Be Who You Actually Are

Many moons ago I was starting my day like many of us enjoying the gifts of dementia by spending most of it screwing up each and every thing I attempted to do, large or small and usually in ways both spectacular as well as costly.  On the verge of tears I spent about an hour medicating with my very best botanicals when I had the BFO (Blinding Flash of the Obvious, engineer-speak): I am still attempting to be something that I am not only NOT but barring acts of a supreme deity, never will be again. Its just that damned simple.

* What makes a persons personality unique is the precise set of influences, patterns of thinking, lifetime experiences or memories amongst many other things. These are all stored and/or controlled by the brain.

* The root cause of dementia is damage to select portions of the brain.

* For better or worse, the simple truth is that this will result in a different person. Not better or lesser, simply different, in the same way that any two coworkers might be very dif…

Holy Crap Batman! A hero with dementia!

Braven 2018
Hey kids, I ran across something you just HAVE to watch. I mean you as in readers of these words. Looking for entertainment last night I was scrounging some of the dodgier parts of the Internet for something not involving a cape or "found footage" to watch. Long story short I ran across something from this year (2018) called Braven, starring Jason Mamoa (Aquaman/Ronin on Stargate Atlantis) and Stephen Lang (the major hard-ass in Avatar).  Plot reads like a B-roll actioner, drug dealers drop in on county folk and try to take them on their own turf. I agree, major tired plotline BUT......
Here is the kicker: The country folks (Mamoa/Lang) are in the cabin in the woods kinda thing because Lang (plays Mamoas dad) has alzheimers (he blames it on some Vietnam injury but...) and got into a fight at a local bar, thinking some girl was his dead wife out on the town. 
Of course Jason beats everyones ass in proper manner as it should be but thats why these two are in the c…